AI Assistance in Documentation

Transparency note on the use of AI in creating this documentation.

What was created with AI assistance

Parts of this GitHub Pages documentation were created with the assistance of Claude (Anthropic, Claude Code). The workflow:

1. The tool analyzed the complete repository state (API, frontend, and Unity source code, configuration files, existing documentation, final presentation).
2. On this basis, documentation pages were drafted: architecture, data model, API reference, error catalog, design decisions, value proposition, plus updates of the project pages.
3. All technical statements were derived from the code or the project documents; statements without evidence are explicitly marked as Assumptions or Missing information on the respective pages.
4. External sources (studies, official documentation) were verified via web research before being cited; invented sources were ruled out.
5. Content responsibility remains with the team: the pages were reviewed by the team and corrected or extended where necessary.

What is not AI-generated

• Weekly reports, project vision, requirements catalog, and goal definitions originate from the team during the project.
• Individual contributions are written exclusively by the team.
• The project’s source code is not covered by this disclosure; how external help was used for development is documented separately in Code Snippets.

Labeling principle

Every generated or revised page ends with four sections: Information sources (evidence), Assumptions (labeled inferences), Missing information (explicit gaps), and Suggested improvements. This makes it traceable which statement rests on what.

Last build: 19 Aug 2026, 05:20+00:00